My guess is they are calling it that for two reasons:
- So they can make it sound "Controversial" to "sell more papers"
The school does not teach Scientology. So how can it be called a "Scientology School"?
What these inaccurate and misinformed reports do is merely obscure the most effective study methods developed since a Greek philosopher stood before a group of interested students and began to expound his ideas.
Think about it: Our teaching methods have not changed in thousands of years.
2,500 years ago in the Gold Age of Greece there were four primary teaching methods:
- Stand in front of a group and tell them stuff
- Write a book and have others read it
- Get your students together and have them discuss ideas
- Show someone by example how to do something
These methods are good methods and have helped us produce our current civilization but what about the poor guy who "just can't get it"? The answers of the existing methods are: "you are stupid" or "you are not smart enough" or "get it or you will fail the class" or "if you fail you won't get that well paid job." or "you will end up flipping burgers for a living" or "you have a learning disability, take this drug so you won't worry about it." These are "blame the student" or "threaten the student" type solutions and are not very helpful.
Study Technology has solutions to those things which stop you from understanding and being able to apply what you are studying. The problems of leaning and education have been solved in Study Technology. That is a bold statement to make, but from personal experience I can tell you that it is a true statement.
For more info on Study Technology:
Study Technology Results and Research Papers
A Workable Answer: Study Technology
What do y'all think? I'd like to get some feedback from people who have used Study Technology. How has it worked for you? What has it enabled you to achieve?